Object
Preferred Options consultation document
Representation ID: 93816
Received: 06/10/2019
Respondent: Mrs LDT Gallagher
It is duplicitous of Norfolk County Council to say SIL02 has not been allocated whilst retaining 1/3 of the area and re-badging as an Area Of Search AOS E. Is this part of AOS E STILL a preferred area? Sibelco has drilled,found silica sand, there is a willing landowner; so what would stop Sibelco putting in a planning application on that area now? Both criteria above are the definition of a preferred area, with NCC likely to give planning permission. MOD (DIO) have been ignored and their agreed objection to the WHOLE of SIL02 has not been implemented -utterly contemptible.
It is duplicitous of Norfolk County Council to say SIL02 has not been allocated whilst retaining 1/3 of the area and re-badging as an Area Of Search AOS E. Is this part of AOS E STILL a preferred area? Sibelco has drilled,found silica sand, there is a willing landowner; so what would stop Sibelco putting in a planning application on that area now? Both criteria above are the definition of a preferred area, with NCC likely to give planning permission. MOD (DIO) have been ignored and their agreed objection to the WHOLE of SIL02 has not been implemented -utterly contemptible.