Object
Preferred Options consultation document
Representation ID: 94585
Received: 29/10/2019
Respondent: Mr B Rhodes
Representation Summary:
We agree with the conclusion that Min 77 is unsuitable for allocation. It also is next to a proposed wildlife park and close to both Tottenhill Row and Watlington properties which have had to contend with the intrusive ongoing sites .
Full text:
We agree with the conclusion that Min 77 is unsuitable for allocation. It also is next to a proposed wildlife park and close to both Tottenhill Row and Watlington properties which have had to contend with the intrusive ongoing sites .