Object
Preferred Options consultation document
Representation ID: 94690
Received: 27/10/2019
Respondent: Mr Andrew Gunton
I object to the proposed site and I fully support the initial conclusion. We shouldn't waste anymore taxpayers money on this proposal and make it the final conclusion.
Visual and amenity impact on the nearby dwellings would be unacceptable;
* Local landscape impacts would be unacceptable;
* The Highway Authority has raised concerns regarding the proposed highway access because the local road network is sub-standard and narrow. Woodrising Road would require widening and a right turn lane would be required at its junction with the B1108 to be made acceptable.
* There is not a mineral operator promoting the proposed site and therefore the site is less deliverable than other sites that have been proposed for extraction.
Adding to this pollution from Dust, Noise and Vibration. Loss of countryside and safety of our roads.
I object to the proposed site and I fully support the initial conclusion. We shouldn't waste anymore taxpayers money on this proposal and make it the final conclusion.
Visual and amenity impact on the nearby dwellings would be unacceptable;
* Local landscape impacts would be unacceptable;
* The Highway Authority has raised concerns regarding the proposed highway access because the local road network is sub-standard and narrow. Woodrising Road would require widening and a right turn lane would be required at its junction with the B1108 to be made acceptable.
* There is not a mineral operator promoting the proposed site and therefore the site is less deliverable than other sites that have been proposed for extraction.
Adding to this pollution from Dust, Noise and Vibration. Loss of countryside and safety of our roads.