Question 57: Proposed site MIN 38 (Waveney Forest, Fritton)
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91770
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms T McNulty
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: Natural spaces must be protected along with all of the inhabitants of the area.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: Natural spaces must be protected along with all of the inhabitants of the area.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91771
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: C J Bryant
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: I object to the proposed loss of woodland.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: I object to the proposed loss of woodland.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91772
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms C Quinn
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: It will spoil my lovely walks.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: It will spoil my lovely walks.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91773
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Mr K Quinn
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91774
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Dr C Winter
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91775
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: S Turner
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: Stop tearing down our green.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: Stop tearing down our green.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91776
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Mr G Wheadon
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: We need some trees... at least they provide some oxygen.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: We need some trees... at least they provide some oxygen.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91777
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: S Hills
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: This would destroy the woods. Absolutely criminal.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: This would destroy the woods. Absolutely criminal.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91778
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: J Stenner
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: We love the woods!! Family walks and memories!!!
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: We love the woods!! Family walks and memories!!!
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91779
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Mr C Bacon
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: It would spoil a beauty spot for walking.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: It would spoil a beauty spot for walking.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91781
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Mr I McKean
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Where are we supposed to walk our dogs?!!
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Where are we supposed to walk our dogs?!!
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91782
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms J Burgoyne
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Stop - we need our green areas!!!
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Stop - we need our green areas!!!
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91783
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms S Tupper -Carey
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91784
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms A Lawrence
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Just no!
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Just no!
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91785
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Mr D Peacock
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: I enjoy the woods and don't want loads of lorries everywhere.
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: I enjoy the woods and don't want loads of lorries everywhere.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91786
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms J Nicholl
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91787
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: K Pryce
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91788
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms A Petersen
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Stop destroying our forests!
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Stop destroying our forests!
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91789
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms B Gislam
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Stop destroying our forests and causing pollution!
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Stop destroying our forests and causing pollution!
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91790
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms A Johnson
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: I enjoy walking my dog there and have done for years.
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: I enjoy walking my dog there and have done for years.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91791
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms A Willis
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Currently it is a lovely place to walk my dogs - it will be ruined if there is a quarry!
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Currently it is a lovely place to walk my dogs - it will be ruined if there is a quarry!
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91792
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms J Lewis
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91793
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms L Hurren
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Amazing memories being spoilt by man!
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Amazing memories being spoilt by man!
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91794
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: L Trindall
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91795
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: J Baldry
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91796
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Ms R De Jean
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: I have been coming to this place since I was a child, I also loved to bring my children there.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: I have been coming to this place since I was a child, I also loved to bring my children there.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91797
Received: 19/07/2018
Respondent: Mr B Hurren
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: Why spoil something that should be protected.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: Why spoil something that should be protected.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91798
Received: 20/07/2018
Respondent: Ms J Steward
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: Infrastructure cannot support this. We use A143 regularly. Dangerous access points.
I object to Brett's application on MIN38.
Comments: Infrastructure cannot support this. We use A143 regularly. Dangerous access points.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91801
Received: 23/07/2018
Respondent: Ms J Norris
I have a strong objections to Min 38, the proposal to desecrate the Waveney Forest
This site is possibly the largest, most secluded, quiet and peaceful recreational amenity that Gt. Yarmouth and it's surrounding villages have.
Don't deprive the general public of their right to enjoyment of such places.
There surely must be sufficient sites put forward that will not affect people's recreational activities and the desecration of valuable woodland
The granting of planning approval of Min 38 would have a huge impact within the society of its local vicinity.
I strongly object to Brett's application.
I have a strong objections to Min 38, the proposal to desecrate the Waveney Forest
This site is possibly the largest, most secluded, quiet and peaceful recreational amenity that Gt. Yarmouth and it's surrounding villages have.
Don't deprive the general public of their right to enjoyment of such places.
There surely must be sufficient sites put forward that will not affect people's recreational activities and and the desecration of valuable woodland
The granting of planning approval of Min 38 would have a huge impact within the society of its local vicinity.
I strongly object to Brett's application.
Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91802
Received: 23/07/2018
Respondent: Mr C Jurak
I object to the proposed destruction of the Waveney Forest in Fritton. This place is of historical importance and should be left in tact. Also all the fascinating bunkers and hides used during both world wars which our great grandparents endured, should be left untouched as a mark of respect.
I played here as a little boy and expect my children to play there to. It taught me about wildlife and natural habitats.
Please save the Waveney Forest
I object to the proposed destruction of the Waveney Forest in Fritton. This place is of historical importance and should be left in tact. Also all the fascinating bunkers and hides used during both world wars which our great grandparents endured, should be left untouched as a mark of respect.
I played here as a little boy and expect my children to play there to. It taught me about wildlife and natural habitats.
Please save the Waveney Forest