M25.8

Showing comments and forms 1 to 16 of 16

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99089

Received: 02/11/2022

Respondent: Mr Tim Haycock

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

M25.8 describes “a small disused mineral working” on the Eastern boundary. This piece of land belongs to the Parish of Haddiscoe and is used as a recreational ground for children playing and dog walkers. Apart from the nuisance of noise and dust to these parishioners, children play unsupervised and although they may stray out of the pit onto agricultural fields it would be a quite different matter if they fell into a working quarry. This is quite contrary to your own Minerals Strategic Objectives, in particular MSO7 which states “To ensure potential impacts on the amenity of those people living in proximity to minerals development are effectively controlled, minimised and mitigated to acceptable levels” It is also at odds with your own Policy MW1 which is supposed to protect “Public Open Space, Local Green Space, the definitive Public Rights of Way network and outdoor recreation facilities” This is unsound and not positively prepared. This site is allocation is unsound and ineffective

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove this allocated site

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99090

Received: 02/11/2022

Respondent: Ms Tanya Fairlie

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

M25.8 describes “a small disused mineral working” on the Eastern boundary. This piece of land belongs to the Parish of Haddiscoe and is used as a recreational ground for children playing and dog walkers. Apart from the nuisance of noise and dust to these parishioners, children play unsupervised and although they may stray out of the pit onto agricultural fields it would be a quite different matter if they fell into a working quarry. This is quite contrary to your own Minerals Strategic Objectives, in particular MSO7 which states “To ensure potential impacts on the amenity of those people living in proximity to minerals development are effectively controlled, minimised and mitigated to acceptable levels” It is also at odds with your own Policy MW1 which is supposed to protect “Public Open Space, Local Green Space, the definitive Public Rights of Way network and outdoor recreation facilities” This is unsound and not positively prepared. This allocation is unsound and ineffective.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove this allocated site

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99106

Received: 08/11/2022

Respondent: Mr Christopher Johnson

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

I feel this leads on from my previous paragraph there is a 'small disused gravel pit' on the eastern boundary of the proposed site. This piece of land belongs to the Parish of Haddiscoe it is used by most of the local residents as a recreational area where the peace of the countryside can be enjoyed. It is used as a safe area to walk dogs and for local children to play. The proposed workings would produce an unacceptable level of noise & dust for this area to be enjoyed. At present children can play unsupervised safely in this, area it they stray they will only stray onto arable land it would quite dangerous if were into a working quarry. This counter to your own Minerals Strategic Objectives MS07 state 'to ensure potential impacts on the amenity of those people living in proximity to minerals development are effectively controlled minimalised & mitigated to acceptable levels' also MW1 of your own policy which is there to protect 'Public Open Spaces, Local Green Areas the Rights of Way network & Outdoor Recreation Facilities. Therefore, I believe this to be unsound & not positively prepared.
Soundness tests: Not justified, not effective, not positively prepared, not consistent with national policy

Change suggested by respondent:

The application should be rejected in full

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99110

Received: 02/11/2022

Respondent: Mr Lee Howell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This proposal will effectively prevent residents in the village using the public space which belongs to the Parish of Haddiscoe on the Eastern Boundary.
Soundness test: Not Justified, Not Effective, Not Positively prepared

Attachments:

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99114

Received: 09/11/2022

Respondent: Mrs Maria Downing

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

M25.8 refers to "a small disused mineral working" is adjacent to the proposed site and in fact is a recreational space/play area owned by the Parish of Haddiscoe. We use this frequently especially with our Grandsons who we regularly care for while their single mother is working. Both boys throughly enjoy the fresh air and playing in this wonderful quiet place and we also use the area for dog walking purposes. There is no doubt that the noise, distrubance, dust and polluants will affect us and our enjoyment of this wonderful space. [Redacted personal data].
This proposal contradicts your own Minerals Strategic Objectives, particularly MS07, stating "To ensure potential impacts on the amenity of those people living in proximinity to minerals developments are effectively controlled, minimised and mitigated to acceptable levels".
Also, your own policy MW1 supposedly is to protect "Public Open Space, Local Green Space, the definite Public Rights of Way network and outdoor recreation facilities".
Soundness test: Not effective

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99175

Received: 21/11/2022

Respondent: Mrs Julie Catmore

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This is “a small disused mineral working” which is mentioned in M25.8 owned by Parish Council and used for recreational purposes where dog walkers go, and children play in a safe environment. This piece of land is located on the Eastern Boundary to proposed site which could potentially be a hazard should a child wander onto the working quarry.
Your policy MW1 states it will protect “Public Open Space, Local Green Space, the definitive Public Rights of Way Network and Outdoor Recreational facilities. This disused mineral working is in immediate vicinity to proposed site and at high risk of dust pollution due to its situation.
Soundness test: Not positively prepared

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99209

Received: 05/12/2022

Respondent: Windmill Cottage Kennels

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This particular paragraph seems completely at odds and contradictory to your own strategic objective specifically MSO7 regarding the impact on the amenity of people living in the area. There is a recreational ground for children and there is a serious safety concern. Public and green space is supposed to be protected and this is at complete odds with the proposal.
Soundness test: Not positively prepared

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99300

Received: 15/12/2022

Respondent: Mr Ray Long

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

M25.8
The "small disused pit" on the eastern boundry is hidden oasis in the village and it is used by dog walkers and villagers and their children and grandchildren,including mine for picnics and walks.
I feel this piece of land has been completely overlooked by the process and as stated in MS07
"potential impacts on the amenity" does not really cover the potential risk to children, pets and wildlife that use this facility and can we be guaranteed that the site will be protected completely from the public?
This site will be impacted.
Soundness test: Not Justified and Not Positively prepared

Change suggested by respondent:

M25.8 Security fencing to be sympathetically installed as not to spoil the natural look of the area to protect villagers children and pets from straying into a working quarry. I feel a soil bund is hardly adequate.

Attachments:

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99360

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

M25 -8 Objections
The Disused Quarry at the Eastern Boundary of the proposed site is now a Natural Haven for wildlife and is used by Dog Walkers and Children Playing and making Dens in the Woods, and Villagers who just want a tranquil area to walk and relax.
This will now be next to the Site and as such tranquillity will be a thing of the past and a potential danger to children who may inadvertently stray out of the area and onto the site.
Again this would appear to contravene MS07
This also disagrees with your own Policy MW1 to protect Public Space ,Green areas and Local green Space and Public Rights of way.
I currently Frequently use the Public Footpath which bi-sects the site again this will be a loss of amenity.

Attachments:

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99375

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Mrs Eve Basford

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The former Parish gravel pit is used as a recreational area for children to play, there is a playground at village hall which means children on this side of village have to cross A143, dangerous for adults. No attempt at any boundary hedge has been planted here.
This does not comply with MW1 to Protect Public Open Space, Green Space
and as a play area could permit children to access the workings.

Change suggested by respondent:

not appropriate to be so close to village centre, any gravel workings should be further away

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99381

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Haddiscoe Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

M25.8 describes “a small disused mineral working” on the Eastern boundary. This piece of land belongs to the Parish of Haddiscoe and is used as a recreational ground for children playing and dog walkers. Apart from the nuisance of noise and dust to these parishioners, children play unsupervised and although they may stray out of the pit onto agricultural fields it would be a quite different matter if they fell into a working quarry. This is quite contrary to your own Minerals Strategic Objectives, in particular MSO7 which states “To ensure potential impacts on the amenity of those people living in proximity to minerals development are effectively controlled, minimised and mitigated to acceptable levels”. It is also at odds with your own Policy MW1 which is supposed to protect “Public Open Space, Local Green Space, the definitive Public Rights of Way network and outdoor recreation facilities”. This is unsound and not positively prepared.

Soundness tests: Not Justified, Not Effective, Not Positively Prepared, Not Consistent with National Policy

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99393

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Mrs Sheila Burton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

M25 -8 Objections
The Disused Quarry at the Eastern Boundary of the proposed site is now a Natural Haven for wildlife and is used by Dog Walkers and Children Playing and making Dens in the Woods, and Villagers who just want a tranquil area to walk and relax
This will now be next to the Site and as such tranquillity will be a thing of the past and a potential danger to children who may inadvertently stray out of the area and onto the site.
Again this would appear to contravene MS07
This also disagrees with your own Policy MW1 to protect Public Space ,Green areas and Local green Space and Public Rights of way
I currently Frequently use the Public Footpath which bi-sects the site again this will be a loss of amenity.

Attachments:

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99398

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Haddiscoe Parocial Church Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

M25 -8 Objections
The Disused Quarry at the Eastern Boundary of the proposed site is now a Natural Haven for wildlife and is used by Dog Walkers and Children Playing and making Dens in the Woods, and Villagers who just want a tranquil area to walk and relax
This will now be next to the Site and as such tranquillity will be a thing of the past and a potential danger to children who may inadvertently stray out of the area and onto the site.
Again this would appear to contravene MS07
This also disagrees with your own Policy MW1 to protect Public Space ,Green areas and Local green Space and Public Rights of way
The frequently used Public Footpath which bi-sects the site again this will be a loss of amenity.

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99408

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Mr Oliver Beatwell

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

M25.8 describes “a small disused mineral working” on the Eastern boundary. This piece of green open land belongs to the Parish of Haddiscoe and is used by my children for playing. This land and the footpaths that run over the proposed site are also used by my family and many others. The massive increase in traffic, nuisance of noise and dust to us parishioners also poses a risk to children that play and could stray out into a working quarry. This is quite contrary to your own Minerals Strategic Objectives, in particular MSO7 which states “To ensure potential impacts on the amenity of those people living in proximity to minerals development are effectively controlled, minimised and mitigated to acceptable levels” It is also at odds with your own Policy MW1 which is supposed to protect “Public Open Space, Local Green Space, the definitive Public Rights of Way network and outdoor recreation facilities.”
These green and natural open spaces are vital for both peoples health, welbeing and the environment and this has not been considered so is unsound and not positively prepared.
Soundness test: Not Positively Prepared

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99439

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Mr Nicholas Kennedy

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

M25.8 Describes a small, disused mineral working on the eastern boundary. This belongs to the Parish Council and is used for recreational facilities for my own children and dog. Apart from the noise and dust, children often play unsupervised. What would happen if they strayed away from there and into a working quarry?! This is at odds with your own policy (MW1) which is supposed to protect public open space, local green space, public rights of way and outdoor recreational facilities.
Soundness test: Not justified and not effective

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove the Haddiscoe proposed pit completely as it is unsound, unjust, and unfair!!

Attachments:

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99499

Received: 15/12/2022

Respondent: Stopit2

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

M25.8 describes “a small disused mineral working” on the Eastern boundary. This piece of land belongs to the Parish of Haddiscoe and is used as a recreational ground for children playing and dog walkers. Apart from the nuisance of noise and dust to these parishioners, children play unsupervised and although they may stray out of the pit onto agricultural fields it would be a quite different matter if they fell into a working quarry. This is quite contrary to your own Minerals Strategic Objectives, in particular MSO7 which states “To ensure potential impacts on the amenity of those people living in proximity to minerals development are effectively controlled, minimised and mitigated to acceptable levels”. It is also at odds with your own Policy MW1 which is supposed to protect “Public Open Space, Local Green Space, the definitive Public Rights of Way network and outdoor recreation facilities”. This is unsound and not positively prepared.

Change suggested by respondent:

Drop Min 25 from the plan and refuse the Breedon planning application.

Attachments: