Initial Consultation document

Search representations

Results for Norfolk Coast Partnership search

New search New search

Comment

Initial Consultation document

Question 75: Proposed site MIN 69

Representation ID: 92894

Received: 05/09/2018

Respondent: Norfolk Coast Partnership

Representation Summary:

I make this response on behalf of the Norfolk Coast Partnership (NCP), the organisation responsible for conserving and enhancing the Norfolk Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. As such, I have only commented on the Local Plan as it impacts on the landscape and natural beauty of this area.

As such, at this time, I only intend to comment on site MIN 69 - land north of Holt Road, Aylmerton, which falls within the AONB boundary.

I agree with the initial conclusion that the site could be considered suitable for sand and gravel extraction but only on condition that a very high quality working and restoration scheme was developed and fully implemented.

Comments:
The NCP would usually object to this type of development within the AONB and suggest that, in line with the NPPF, it should take place outside of the AONB boundaries. This proposed site would undoubtedly have a landscape impact and an impact on the landscape impact of users, in particular in terms of views from the A148, and also on the local rights of way network. There would be negative effects on the landscape, geodiversity, biodiversity and amenity.

However, I would be willing to consider this development as acceptable if the proposed working and restoration scheme described in this Initial Consultation document were developed, fully implemented, and audited. I would expect any scheme to be developed in consultation with stakeholders, including the NCP.

Full text:

I make this response on behalf of the Norfolk Coast Partnership (NCP), the organisation responsible for conserving and enhancing the Norfolk Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. As such, I have only commented on the Local Plan as it impacts on the landscape and natural beauty of this area.

As such, at this time, I only intend to comment on site MIN 69 - land north of Holt Road, Aylmerton, which falls within the AONB boundary.

MIN 69 - land north of Holt Road, Aylmerton
Question 75: Do you agree or disagree with the initial conclusion? Do you have any comments to make about the assessment of this site?

I agree with the initial conclusion that the site could be considered suitable for sand and gravel extraction but only on condition that a very high quality working and restoration scheme was developed and fully implemented.

Comments:
The NCP would usually object to this type of development within the AONB and suggest that, in line with the NPPF, it should take place outside of the AONB boundaries. This proposed site would undoubtedly have a landscape impact and an impact on the landscape impact of users, in particular in terms of views from the A148, and also on the local rights of way network. There would be negative effects on the landscape, geodiversity, biodiversity and amenity.

However, I would be willing to consider this development as acceptable if the proposed working and restoration scheme described in this Initial Consultation document were developed, fully implemented, and audited. I would expect any scheme to be developed in consultation with stakeholders, including the NCP.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.