Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Object

Representation ID: 99207

Received: 05/12/2022

Respondent: Windmill Cottage Kennels

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposed plan for MIN 25 has far more residential properties than other sites, other than maybe one exception. I believe that light pollution especially during winter has not been taken into account and addressed and also this proposed site would have far more detrimental effects on the village in comparison to other potential sites.
Soundness test: Not Effective

Object

Representation ID: 99208

Received: 05/12/2022

Respondent: Windmill Cottage Kennels

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The policy in respect to paragraph M25.2 estimates 80 HGV movements per day. This will add considerable traffic count through the village if as well as this the processed gravel is also taken into account, the roads around the village would be adversely affected.
Soundness test: Not positively prepared

Object

Representation ID: 99209

Received: 05/12/2022

Respondent: Windmill Cottage Kennels

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This particular paragraph seems completely at odds and contradictory to your own strategic objective specifically MSO7 regarding the impact on the amenity of people living in the area. There is a recreational ground for children and there is a serious safety concern. Public and green space is supposed to be protected and this is at complete odds with the proposal.
Soundness test: Not positively prepared

Object

Representation ID: 99210

Received: 05/12/2022

Respondent: Windmill Cottage Kennels

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This particular paragraph intermates that the previous reason for refusal when it came to being refused was just the development south of the B1136 when this clearly is not the case. There were many factors including increased noise, dust and traffic which would arise and have a clearly detrimental effect on the whole of the area not just one particular location.
Soundness test: Not positively prepared

Object

Representation ID: 99211

Received: 05/12/2022

Respondent: Windmill Cottage Kennels

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

This paragraph states the shortfall being 12.6m tonnes is less than the estimated resource of 15.4m tonnes, in effect this means that the Haddiscoe site could be removed and still there would be an excess.
Soundness test: Not justified