Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Search representations

Results for Broads Authority search

New search New search

Comment

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

6.30

Representation ID: 99139

Received: 11/11/2022

Respondent: Broads Authority

Representation Summary:

Para after 6.30 could do with a para number

Comment

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Map 4. 5-mile zones surrounding urban areas and 3-mile zones surrounding main towns

Representation ID: 99140

Received: 11/11/2022

Respondent: Broads Authority

Representation Summary:

Map 4 – may not matter, but the urban areas are blue, and the main towns are blue, and the shades are not very different, so it is not easy to tell which blue is which.

Comment

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Policy MP6: Cumulative impacts and phasing of workings

Representation ID: 99141

Received: 11/11/2022

Respondent: Broads Authority

Representation Summary:

MP6, as worded, is quite complicated… in the same sentence, the policy talks about making something unacceptable, acceptable… I understand what is trying to be said here, but I wonder if the wording is clear.

Comment

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

MP7.5

Representation ID: 99142

Received: 11/11/2022

Respondent: Broads Authority

Representation Summary:

MP7.5 – grammar - strategy for maintaining biodiversity

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

6.16

Representation ID: 99143

Received: 11/11/2022

Respondent: Broads Authority

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 6.16 – bullet point on lighting – needs to say more – it is about justifying the need for light in the first place, designing light so it is shielded and pointing down, of the right intensity for the job and only on when needed. This paragraph is a good start but does not go far enough and as per the comments on MW1, Policy MW1 needs to be wider than the impact of light on amenity.

Soundness test: Not justified

Change suggested by respondent:

Change criterion to say:

[Insert: 'Only using lighting if fully justified'], minimising the use of external lighting, use hooded/cowled lighting to direct light downwards, [insert: 'only have the lighting on when it is needed (use timers, on/off switches or motion sensors), make sure the intensity is appropriate for the lighting task'] and contain light within the site.

Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Policy MW1: Development Management Criteria

Representation ID: 99144

Received: 11/11/2022

Respondent: Broads Authority

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

MW1 part 1 – to be consistent with the NPPF, this criterion needs to mention the impact on the setting of these assets as well as on the assets themselves.

Soundness test: Not justified

Change suggested by respondent:

Change criterion to say:
Protected landscapes [insert: 'and their setting'] including the Norfolk Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, the Heritage Coast and the Broads.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.