Proposed Main Modifications
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchComment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM05 - Policy MW1. Development Management Criteria, Page 27
Representation ID: 99570
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the new text at the end of the existing paragraph on the Historic Environment relating to archaeology.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM20 - Policy WP2. Spatial Strategy for Waste Management Facilities, Page 52
Representation ID: 99571
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the additional references to conservation areas and also clarification with regard to significance and setting.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM24 - Policy WP13. Landfill mining and reclamation, Page 63
Representation ID: 99572
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the reference to the historic environment and restoration.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM49 - Policy MP2. Spatial Strategy for Minerals Extraction, Page 75
Representation ID: 99573
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the additional reference to conservation areas and also clarification with regard to significance and setting.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Object
Proposed Main Modifications
MM52 - Policy MP5. Core River Valleys, Page 79
Representation ID: 99574
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
In the second bullet point the introduction of the words 'where appropriate' changes the meaning of the previous draft policy and waters it down. Therefore, we advise that the words 'where appropriate' should be deleted.
In second bullet point delete 'where appropriate'
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM54 - Policy MP7. Progressive Working, Restoration and Afteruse, page 82
Representation ID: 99575
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the reference to historic landscape characterisation.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM65 - Paragraph M96.4, Page 136
Representation ID: 99576
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the proposed modification to Paragraph M96.4 to clarify what mitigation measures are required at Grange Farm, Spixworth to protect the setting of nearby listed buildings following the recommendations of the HIA.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM66 - Policy MIN 96. Land at Grange Farm, Spixworth, page 140
Representation ID: 99577
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the proposed modification to clarify what mitigation measures are required at Grange Farm, Spixworth to protect the setting of nearby listed buildings following the recommendations of the HIA.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM67 - Policy SIL01, Land at Mintlyn South, Bawsey, Page 159
Representation ID: 99578
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the proposed modification to Policy SIL 01 to make reference to the listed font nearby.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
MM69 - Paragraph M25.23 Restoration, page 184
Representation ID: 99579
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
Although we continue to have concerns regarding the impact of the proposed development on the Grade I listed Haddiscoe Church and other heritage assets, we welcome the proposed modification to paragraph M25.23 in relation to site restoration.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]