Object
Initial Consultation document
Representation ID: 91819
Received: 23/07/2018
Respondent: Ms S Aldren
It is with regret and astonishment that I am writing to express my opinions on the councils Minerals and Waste strategy proposal using land adjacent to the village of Haddiscoe.
Having been through a full and thorough testing of the site, a previous planning application was totally rejected by all councils as wholly unsuitable. The application was taken to the highest appeal and ministers rejected it unanimously.
The issues which led to rejection are still applicable and therefore make this site unacceptable for the council's future plans, namely: proximity to the village, (my property borders onto the proposed site), the road infrastructure and traffic volume would be a serious concern, along with pollutants which would lead to health issues for residents. The effect on the water table and wildlife being on the Broads National Park would also have a considerable effect.
I feel there is no case to answer as this site has been fully investigated and found lacking, therefore, common sense suggests no more time or money should be wasted by considering its inclusion on the Minerals and Waste proposal.
It is with regret and astonishment that I am writing to express my opinions on the councils Minerals and Waste strategy proposal using land adjacent to the village of Haddiscoe.
Having been through a full and thorough testing of the site, a previous planning application was totally rejected by all councils as wholly unsuitable. The application was taken to the highest appeal and ministers rejected it unanimously.
The issues which led to rejection are still applicable and therefore make this site unacceptable for the council's future plans, namely: proximity to the village, (my property borders onto the proposed site), the road infrastructure and traffic volume would be a serious concern, along with pollutants which would lead to health issues for residents. The effect on the water table and wildlife being on the Broads National Park would also have a considerable effect.
I feel there is no case to answer as this site has been fully investigated and found lacking, therefore, common sense suggests no more time or money should be wasted by considering its inclusion on the Minerals and Waste proposal.