Object

Preferred Options consultation document

Representation ID: 95015

Received: 30/10/2019

Respondent: Mr Mark Kiddle-Morris

Representation Summary:

Agree with the assessment of this site. I this site were allocated and the potential start date of 2020 realized there could potentially be 3 operational sites within a small area if MIN13/MIN51 and MIN12 are both allocated. The cumulative impact would be unacceptable. Access from the site would be on to Bilney Road which is not currently suitable for long term HGV use. Access to the B1146 would be at Rawhall Lane, again the preferred access point for the other mineral sites. This site should not be allocated.

Full text:

Agree with the assessment of this site. I this site were allocated and the potential start date of 2020 realized there could potentially be 3 operational sites within a small area if MIN13/MIN51 and MIN12 are both allocated. The cumulative impact would be unacceptable. Access from the site would be on to Bilney Road which is not currently suitable for long term HGV use. Access to the B1146 would be at Rawhall Lane, again the preferred access point for the other mineral sites. This site should not be allocated.