Object
Preferred Options consultation document
Representation ID: 95627
Received: 14/10/2019
Respondent: Mr Jason Bishop
Please accept this objection.
"I object to quarrying in SIL 02. It is false of Norfolk County Council to say SIL02 has not been allocated whilst retaining 1/3 of the area and re-badging as an Area Of Search, AOS E. This area has known mineral deposits and there is a willing landowner. These are the criteria that define a preferred area. NCC has agreed with the MOD (DIO ) objection to SIL 02 that the WHOLE of SIL02 should be removed but has consciously chosen to ignore it by not removing the overlap area of SIL 02 and AOS entirely. I object to this and demand that NCC removes this overlap area from their M&WLP."
Please accept this objection.
"I object to quarrying in SIL 02. It is false of Norfolk County Council to say SIL02 has not been allocated whilst retaining 1/3 of the area and re-badging as an Area Of Search, AOS E. This area has known mineral deposits and there is a willing landowner. These are the criteria that define a preferred area. NCC has agreed with the MOD (DIO ) objection to SIL 02 that the WHOLE of SIL02 should be removed but has consciously chosen to ignore it by not removing the overlap area of SIL 02 and AOS entirely. I object to this and demand that NCC removes this overlap area from their M&WLP."