Object
Preferred Options consultation document
Representation ID: 98512
Received: 24/10/2019
Respondent: Mr J Sadler
I object to quarrying in SIL 02 . It is false of Norfolk County Council to say SIL02 has not been allocated whilst retaining 1/3 of the area and re-badging as an Area Of Search, AOS E This area has known mineral deposits and there is a willing landowner. These are the criteria that define a. Preferred area. NCC has agreed with the MOD (DIO) objection to SIL 02 that the WHOLE of SIL02 should be removed but has conscious chosen to ignore it by not removing the overlap area of SIL02 and AOS entirely. I object to this and demand that NCC removes this overlap area from their M&WLP.
Thank you. Please record this as an objection
I object to quarrying in SIL 02 . It is false of Norfolk County Council to say SIL02 has not been allocated whilst retaining 1/3 of the area and re-badging as an Area Of Search, AOS E This area has known mineral deposits and there is a willing landowner. These are the criteria that define a. Preferred area. NCC has agreed with the MOD (DIO) objection to SIL 02 that the WHOLE of SIL02 should be removed but has conscious chosen to ignore it by not removing the overlap area of SIL02 and AOS entirely. I object to this and demand that NCC removes this overlap area from their M&WLP.
Thank you. Please record this as an objection