Object

Representation ID: 99093

Received: 02/11/2022

Respondent: Ms Tanya Fairlie

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

MP1 states that the shortfall of 12.6m tonnes is less than the estimated resource bank at 15.4m tonnes (appendix 1), so the Haddiscoe site (MIN 25) could be removed altogether and there would still be an excess of 1.5m tonnes (15.4m – 1.3m= 14.1m less 12.6m), assuming that all other sites are approved. The inclusion of recycled aggregates in the methodology would further increase the excess supply. This is unsound and not justified