Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99104

Received: 08/11/2022

Respondent: Mr Christopher Johnson

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

MP1 The Haddiscoe site could be removed completely if all other sites were approved if not it would further increase the excess supply. Therefore, I believe this to be unsound and totally not justified.
M25 The Breedon presentation on 16th June 2022 estimated that this quarry would only produce 0.65m tonnes therefore its removal would have very little impact on the plan. Indeed, if include re-cycled aggregates it would remove totally the need for the quarry here at Haddiscoe. Therefore, I believe this is unsound & not justified.
Soundness tests: Not justified, not effective, not positively prepared, not consistent with national policy

Change suggested by respondent:

The application should be rejected in full

Attachments: