Object

Representation ID: 99363

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

M25 - 9 Objections
This is misleading !! It infers that the only reason Planning was refused and the appeal in 2014 was rejected was the part of the proposed development South of the B1136.This is not the case . In his proof of evidence in 2014 Mr Simon Smith (NCC Planning) quotes the original grounds for refusal, including " The landscape and visual impacts of the proposed development including the construction of artificial bunds and land raised areas would be detrimental to the overall appearance and rural character of the area " and " The proposed development would adversely affect amenities of nearby Residents due to increased noise ,dust and traffic that would arise from the proposed quarry" which applies to the whole of the area and not just the proximity of Grade 1 listed St Marys Church.
This is unsound and not positively prepared.