Object

Representation ID: 99403

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Haddiscoe Parocial Church Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

MP1 States that the shortfall of12.6m tonnes is less than the estimated resource bank at 15.4m tonnes (appendix1), so the Haddiscoe site M25 could be removed all together from the plan and there would still be an excess of1.5m tonnes (15.4 - 1.3 = 14.1 less 12.6m assuming that all other sites are approved. The inclusion of recycled aggregates in the methodology woulds further increase the excess supply. This is unsound and not justified

M25 The Haddiscoe site is included at 1.3m tonnes. The Breedon presentation in June 2022 estimated that the site would only produce 0.65m tonnes, so its removal would have even less impact on the plan. I would also argue that the inclusion of recycled aggregate removes the need for the Haddiscoe Site M25 entirely.
This is unsound and not justified.