Supporting documents to proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchComment
Supporting documents to proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications
Schedule of proposed Additional Modifications to the NM&WLP(2024)
Representation ID: 99569
Received: 02/12/2024
Respondent: Historic England
AM14 Paragraph 3.21
We welcome the additional references to Carstone and use of dimension stone for conservation purposes.
AM30 Paragraph 6.31
We welcome the additional information on below ground archaeology.
AM47 Paragraph W2.1
We welcome the information on how the historic environment has been considered in the Spatial Strategy.
AM50 Paragraph W2.5
We welcome the clarification in relation to less than substantial harm.
AM75 Paragraph MP1.12
We welcome the additional references to Carstone and use of dimension stone for conservation purposes.
AM76 Paragraph MP1.15
To clarify which sites are allocated for Carstone.
AM78 Paragraph MP2.1
We welcome the information on how the historic environment has been considered in the Spatial Strategy.
AM79 Paragraph MP2.9
We welcome the clarification in relation to less than substantial harm.
AM101 Paragraph M96.19
We welcome the reference to heritage enhancement through restoration.
Thank you for consulting Historic England about the proposed Modifications to the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. We have the following comments to make on the suggested changes to the Plan:-
We welcome many of the Proposed Modifications. Our detailed comments on the proposed Main Modifications and Additional Modifications to the Plan are set out in Appendix A.
There is just one minor issue that we raise in relation addition of the words ‘where appropriate’ in Policy MP5 Core River Valleys. See Appendix A for details. We recommend these words are deleted.
We continue to have concerns regarding the allocation at Haddiscoe but welcome the additional policy wording in relation to site restoration.
Finally, we should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals, which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment.
If you have any queries about any of the matters raised or consider that a meeting would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me. [Appendix A provided as an attachment]