Object

Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Pre-Submission Publication

Representation ID: 99438

Received: 19/12/2022

Respondent: Mr Nicholas Kennedy

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

M25.1 Looking at it, MIN25 has by far the highest number of residential properties within 250 metres of the site. All other proposed sites have less than 20 properties. Why? This goes against your own minerals strategic objectives which states it ensures potential impacts on those people living in proximity to the development are controlled, minimised, and mitigated to acceptable levels. This is unsound!
M25.1 Also does not address anything in regard to light pollution especially in winter months. The area nominated is actually the highest elevation within the village. This again is unsound and not prepared well.
Soundness test: Not justified and not effective

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove the Haddiscoe proposed pit completely as it is unsound, unjust, and unfair!!

Attachments: