Question 57: Proposed site MIN 38 (Waveney Forest, Fritton)

Object

Representation ID: 92830

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs J Bosworth

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Putting people's lives at risk. Since the new road from Bradwell to Gorleston was opened, the A143 through Fritton and St Olaves is now the main route for ambulances to and from James Paget Hospital. Frequently I have seen ambulances with flashing lights held up due to tail back of traffic. How much worse would this be with heavy lorries from a quarry.

Object

Representation ID: 92831

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr T Johnson

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: I am totally against the plan / scheme.

Object

Representation ID: 92832

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs K & M Chesneau

Number of people: 2

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Please do not blight our village for profit and greed. This will further damage my health and cost the NHS service, which is already stretched. The forest is the lungs of our villages.

Object

Representation ID: 92833

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs R & J Smith

Number of people: 2

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We already have enough heavy traffic thundering through the village.

Object

Representation ID: 92834

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr L Buckenham

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: lovely woodland and lots of wildlife affected.

Object

Representation ID: 92835

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms R Buckenham

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: I moved here to give my family a healthier living away from pollution and I truly cannot believe that you would allow such a place of beauty with so much wildlife to be destroyed!!

Object

Representation ID: 92836

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms S Buckenham

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Too much dust will affect my breathing as I have issues.

Object

Representation ID: 92837

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms L Johnson

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We would be devastated if this quarry were allowed as I feel it would ruin the village and make an already dangerous road even worse.

Object

Representation ID: 92838

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr P Mansfield

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92839

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: D Youngs

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Not now, not ever.

Object

Representation ID: 92840

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr J Binding

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We cherish our health, home and environment, do not despoil this for profit.

Object

Representation ID: 92841

Received: 10/09/2018

Respondent: Ms A Alcock

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92842

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr D Alcock

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92843

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs J Kettless

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Not enough green spaces and will cause danger to the wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 92844

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms M Macleod

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: I walk dogs around that area.

Object

Representation ID: 92845

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms C White

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: I walk my dogs in the forest.

Object

Representation ID: 92846

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: W A Sutton

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Not in a National Park!!!

Object

Representation ID: 92847

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms T Sweeney

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92848

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs V Johnson

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Save our woodland forest for many generations to come.

Object

Representation ID: 92849

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr G Johnson

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Save for future generations.

Object

Representation ID: 92850

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms L Willert

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92851

Received: 10/09/2018

Respondent: Mr M Farman

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: The only woodland area around so need it for pleasure of the wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 92852

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr D Robinson

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92853

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr B Mallett

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92854

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms A Young

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Need these places for wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 92855

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr D Farman

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92856

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms A Light

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Loss of valuable forest.

Object

Representation ID: 92857

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms M Robinson

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92858

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr L Smith

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92859

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs R Flat

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Such a place of great natural beauty.