Question 57: Proposed site MIN 38 (Waveney Forest, Fritton)

Object

Representation ID: 92436

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mr J Blyth

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: The forest is beautiful with lots of wildlife. Leave it alone!!!

Object

Representation ID: 92437

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mr L Stocks

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: No!

Object

Representation ID: 92438

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs Virginia Fox

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Traffic noise WW2 artefacts

Object

Representation ID: 92439

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms S Chapman

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: save our trees and wildlife

Object

Representation ID: 92440

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms E Goodwin

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: save our forest!

Object

Representation ID: 92441

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms S Dack

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92442

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms J Coleman

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92443

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms A Gage

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92444

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs J & V Jeffries

Number of people: 2

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92445

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs M Cooper

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: This is a family wood not a quarry!

Object

Representation ID: 92446

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms N Vasey

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: No way!!!!!!! Have a heart

Object

Representation ID: 92447

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms J Arnold

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92448

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms H Linkhorn

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92449

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms J Waite

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92450

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mr I Parrott

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92451

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms I Martin

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Save Fritton!

Object

Representation ID: 92452

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms S Harvey

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92453

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms C Harvey

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Why?

Object

Representation ID: 92454

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mr B Vasey

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Save the trees

Object

Representation ID: 92455

Received: 30/08/2018

Respondent: Mr M Musciano

I visited Waveney Forest for the first time last month. Where I live in rural Shropshire we are lucky to have large areas of unspoilt woodland which enhances the county's tourist income. I love Norfolk and Suffolk and visit every summer, but exploring further this time, due to retirement and being able to be there longer. I found a lack of uncultivated land, i.e. woodland and heath, which was a disappointment, until I discovered Waveney. I enjoyed two long walks on separate days. The forest delighted me in particular as being completely different to anything we have in Shropshire. I felt I could stay a bit longer in the area with such an amenity to enjoy. In the 8 days I was there this year I not only paid for my stay at a nearby camping and caravan site, but also used local shops and restaurants: it is an area particularly attractive to countryside-loving visitors. A quarry there would deter me from staying nearby. It goes without saying that local wildlife would suffer catastrophically.

Object

Representation ID: 92456

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: E P Smith

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Death knell to the village. Homes will be unsellable.

Object

Representation ID: 92457

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs R & B Ceiley

Number of people: 2

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Forest bursting with wildlife. Their habitat will be destroyed.

Object

Representation ID: 92458

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: M J Brett

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Been using these woods for 60 years as a child and now take my grandson to walk the dogs in there over the years.

Object

Representation ID: 92459

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms T Parrott

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Representation ID: 92460

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms Z Allen

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Save Fritton Woods

Object

Representation ID: 92461

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs B Beales

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Volume traffic; world war 2 artefacts

Object

Representation ID: 92462

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms J Gent

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Volume traffic; world war 2 artefacts

Object

Representation ID: 92463

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms C Hacking

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: No No No!!

Object

Representation ID: 92464

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: G Harrison

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: My friend always walks her dog here.

Object

Representation ID: 92465

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms V Robinson

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We need areas for family to walk.