Question 57: Proposed site MIN 38 (Waveney Forest, Fritton)

Showing comments and forms 301 to 330 of 355

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92860

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs S Pearson

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We need more trees not less.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We need more trees not less.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92861

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: W Mallet

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92862

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mrs J M Newman

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Why spoil a beautiful natural spot.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Why spoil a beautiful natural spot.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92863

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms L Johnson

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92864

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms T Duffield

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: No way!

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: No way!

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92865

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: R Hubbard

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92866

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms K A King

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Killing our wildlife - our countryside and in the end life itself.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Killing our wildlife - our countryside and in the end life itself.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92867

Received: 14/08/2018

Respondent: Ms P King

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Disgusting

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Disgusting.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92868

Received: 14/09/2018

Respondent: Mrs L P Moore

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Waveney forest has been enjoyed by families and dog walkers for many years. It would be a great loss if Brett's application was agreed.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Waveney forest has been enjoyed by families and dog walkers for many years. It would be a great loss if Brett's application was agreed.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92869

Received: 14/08/2018

Respondent: Ms S L Moore

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: The woods have been enjoyed by the public for years, it will be a sad loss of a beautiful area.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: The woods have been enjoyed by the public for years, it will be a sad loss of a beautiful area.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92870

Received: 14/08/2018

Respondent: Mr B Ryall

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92871

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs N & L Driscoll & Jackson

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: The woods have been enjoyed by the public for years, it will be a sad loss of a beautiful area.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We need to keep what forests we have left, not destroy them!!

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92872

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms P Vincent

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92873

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr S Stollworthy

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Walk my dog and enjoy the area as it is.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Walk my dog and enjoy the area as it is.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92874

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Ms S Secher-Parkman

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92875

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: A Hale

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: This plan would ruin a beautiful area, too much development already!!

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: This plan would ruin a beautiful area, too much development already!!

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92876

Received: 10/09/2018

Respondent: Mr S Shand

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92877

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: B J Buckoke

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Our village already has traffic build up every day, what has changed since this was turned down last time.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: Our village already has traffic build up every day, what has changed since this was turned down last time.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92878

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: P Sharpe

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92879

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms L Thorpe

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92880

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: M Bradford

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92881

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr B Roberts

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92882

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms C Buss

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

I work in Fritton and [redacted text - personal data], it would not be good for our owls at the owl sanctuary.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

I work in Fritton and [redacted text - personal data], it would not be good for our owls at the owl sanctuary.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92883

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr A J Roberts

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: My property has been on sale for some weeks now; this new and latest application has probably delayed any chances I have of selling and moving close to my grandchildren, for a long time.
Aside of the personal obstruction, I do think it outrageous that the council even considers this application which is substantially affecting the homes bordering the field. Mine doesn't but even so. Please, please make a final decision asap.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: My property has been on sale for some weeks now; this new and latest application has probably delayed any chances I have of selling and moving close to my grandchildren, for a long time.
Aside of the personal obstruction, I do think it outrageous that the council even considers this application which is substantially affecting the homes bordering the field. Mine doesn't but even so. Please, please make a final decision asap.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92884

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: R Foster

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: It will destroy the quality rural community putting lives at risk. To allow a project of this nature so close to a community will be a total disregard towards the quality of our lives. Dust, noise, increase of lorries into a major road will be a threat to the ecology, health and safety of the inhabitants in this area.
The only access west onto the A143 is over an ancient bridge with a single lane for traffic, then proceeding onto a 2 mile marsh road with equal hazards that occur on the Acle straight.
To the east the increase of lorries will add further congestion into a built up area, create disruption to business and hospital.
The impact will make a total mockery in the way Norfolk is portrayed and endanger our values.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: It will destroy the quality rural community putting lives at risk. To allow a project of this nature so close to a community will be a total disregard towards the quality of our lives. Dust, noise, increase of lorries into a major road will be a threat to the ecology, health and safety of the inhabitants in this area.
The only access west onto the A143 is over an ancient bridge with a single lane for traffic, then proceeding onto a 2 mile marsh road with equal hazards that occur on the Acle straight.
To the east the increase of lorries will add further congestion into a built up area, create disruption to business and hospital.
The impact will make a total mockery in the way Norfolk is portrayed and endanger our values.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92885

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Ms S Hughes

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92886

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: Mr B Brown

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92887

Received: 09/08/2018

Respondent: A Minister

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92888

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr N Chaling

Representation Summary:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Full text:

I object to Brett's application on MIN 38.
Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Object

Initial Consultation document

Representation ID: 92889

Received: 10/08/2018

Respondent: Mr DC Mallett

Representation Summary:

Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.

Full text:

Comments: We are the family owners of a successful retail nursery at Fritton trading under Fritton Plant Centre (Myhills Nurseries Ltd) on a ten acre site fronting the main A143 at Fritton. We employ staff some local as well as the family. In addition we have a registered charity owl sanctuary and a pet centre on site. We also have planning permission for a seven day flea and antique/collectors market with anything from twenty to thirty stall holders in situ at any one time. I strongly object to Brett's application on Min 38 for the following reasons: noise, pollution and dust affecting the health of our employees, ourselves, our workers and the devaluation of our business and property.